JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 15, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Luis Carlos Perez Morales Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-197/98
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Jurisprudencia Constitucional
  • Cambio no constituye violación del debido proceso
Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Carácter excepcional
  • Casos en que procede
  • Término para proponerse
Nulidad Sentencia Sobre Objeciones Presidenciales
  • No mención de intervinientes no implica violación debido proceso
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente el escrito presentado por los ciudadanos de la referencia, toda vez que la Corte no puede acceder a que se adicione y menos a que "se rehaga" una sentencia suya.

Carece de competencia para proceder en tal forma, culminando como está el proceso de constitucionalidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RECHAZAR por improcedente el escrito presentado por los ciudadanos LUIS CARLOS PEREZ MORALES, CARLOS BALLESTEROS BARON y MARIA VICTORIA DIAZ ALVAREZ.
  2. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.